David Chart’s Blog

Latest News

  • Glosses and Commentaries

    I have just published a new RPG work. Glosses and Commentaries is a short supplement for Ars Magica Definitive Edition, released under the Ars Magica Open License. It is available for purchase on DriveThruRPG and on Patreon.

    In the medieval period, certain authors and texts were regarded as authorities on a particular subject (Aristotle, in particular). A lot of effort was devoted to glossing these texts, which meant adding information on the page to make the book easier to understand, and a lot of people wrote commentaries on them. This is not, however, something that the current Ars Magica rules really support — you might as well write a book as a completely original project.

    This may reflect contemporary thinking about the importance of complete originality, or it may just be a matter of trying not to make the rules too complex. I know that I was thinking the latter, but I may have been influenced by the former. Covenants includes some brief rules for commentaries and glosses, but they do not really encourage their creation.

    These rules do. The main tool they use for this is reducing the Source Quality of a book that is not a commentary, and has not been glossed. This makes the book worse as a source for study. The Source Quality of any book can be improved by glossing, up to the quality of a book under the standard rules, and a commentary can start with the same quality, if the author has access to at least six commentaries on the same work, as well as the work itself.

    While these rules do not specify authorities, they naturally create them, and the supplement includes an example, Bonisagus’s original text on Magic Theory. Bonisagus was, in this example, a good teacher and writer (as he really needs to be, given his historical role), but later glossators have made even better versions of the text available. Similarly, people have written many commentaries on his text, and so if a maga wants to write a book about Magic Theory, it is probably best to write it as a commentary on Bonisagus’s work, because it is easiest to get access to other commentaries on that book. Thus, the glossed version of Bonisagus’s book is an excellent text on Magic Theory, and most of the other good texts available on the subject are commentaries on it. This makes Bonisagus an authority, without including rules for it.

    It also makes it possible for a maga to turn her own work into an authority. Write a book, and then convince other magi to gloss it and write commentaries. Then have the glossed version and commentaries copied, and distribute them throughout the Order. It would be expensive, but it is another way for a maga to secure her legacy.

    If you want to try this out in your own sagas, the supplement is available for purchase on DriveThruRPG and on Patreon.

News Archive

My Writing

Fiction

I have written some fiction.

Academic

I have published a few peer-reviewed academic works, on philosophy and Japanese history.

Roleplaying Games

I have written for roleplaying games.

Mimusubi

Mimusubi is my project for non-fiction writing about Shinto. It has its own website.

Recent Blog Posts

  • Character Resistance

    The ways in which characters become obstacles to the personae will be defined with numbers, to fit with the rest of the mechanics. However, I think they will be defined with simple numbers, not dice. This is because the active force in the game should be the personae, not the characters. The personae drive things…

  • GM-Free Scenarios

    Why do characters come into conflict with personae? Because the characters want things that differ from what the personae want, or because the personae want things from the characters that the characters are not immediately willing to give. That, of course, is the in-game reason. The meta-game reason is that conflict with characters is one…

  • The Process of Intimacy

    The rules described so far can be used for building relationships or changing attitudes. Although the game roles of these two are different, they are closely linked, and in the real world it would be hard to separate them. Therefore, the same kinds of actions can be used to modify either. So, the personae could…

  • Learning about People

    What are the sorts of things that serve as elements when trying to find out about someone? The default assumption is that the personae are not spying on and manipulating the character, although that is possible, and should be supported by the rules at some point (although not necessarily in the core book). Instead, the…

  • Constructing a Theory

    What do personae do with the information they have gathered? They put it together into a theory that tells them something about the subject they are investigating. Putting the information together is another simple roll. The player rolls the relevant knowledge, and keeps the number of dice granted by the pieces of information. A persona…

  • Interpreting

    The next step in discovery is mechanically simple. The player rolls her persona’s investigation dice, and keeps the number of dice indicated by the elements of her investigation. The result of this roll is the pool of points that the player can use to describe the information that her character has discovered. Again, this is…

  • Investigating

    The investigation phase of discovery does not involve any die rolls. Instead, the players describe how the persona is investigating the subject, and describe something of what she finds. This is tied to the game mechanics by elements. The elements of this phase describe things that the persona does to investigate. Each element has two…

  • The Basis of Discovery

    Discovery is also supposed to be an important part of Kannagara. In the grand concept, the discovery in question is things like discovering how to transform yourself into a kannagi, but discovering what sort of food someone likes so that you can cook her the perfect dinner falls under the same general category, and that’s…

  • Putting Numbers on Bonds

    In order to make the rules for building relationships definite, I need to start attaching numbers to it. The best place to start is with the strength of relationships, since everything will develop from there. A strong relationship is, let us say, a score of 6. This allows for a lot of differentiation between relationships;…

  • Building Relationships

    Creating and improving relationships with characters, and quite possibly between personae, should be one of the central activities of personae in Kannagara. Given the design philosophy of the game, that means that we need rules for building a relationship. I don’t want to introduce something completely new, so I will use the structure of the…